1st activity
Continuing the troll activity (from previous lesson) through the use of conscience alley. This time, it is before the troll go to the bridge to guard and to defend the bridge from the goats. Post an fb post you would say to the person. As each person walks down the ale, the person standing in the rows will say out his/her post. This conscience alley gives him/her a clue of who each person(standing in the row) is impersonating as. Some were mother, gorlfriend, best friend Etc.
We tried another round, this time with the troll being defeated by the goats. By impersonating characters, we are able to find out the personality of that character and post on the fb. We may even find similarities or likeness of ourselves with these characters.
Conscience alley is a great activity for characterisation. As a person walks down the ale, he/she hear voices of the different characters in a story or a play. The person gets to know the emotions, thoughts and personality of the characters who are standing in the rows. So in a way, the person walking down the ale knows generally the personality of the characters in the play. The people standing in rows are in the form of their characters, hence characterisation is being employed. They imagine themselves as the characters and think how the characters will react to the person walking down the ale.
Hotseatting each groups
We are allowed to use any characters relating to the troll or even using the troll itself to come up with an issue of statement. It is important that we come up with an objective and answer the journalists. We must abide by our stand. I impersonated the mother. I didn't understand that a soldier would be in his lowest rank if he has fit. So I just blurted it out. It wasn't what we discussed but it turned the focus of the troll's mistakes to something else. I wanted to use a medical condition that the troll has so that the journalists' attention will divert from the mistakes of the troll towards a medical fault that the troll cannot control. I wanted to gain their trust and understanding.
The objective behind hotseatting is to get the audience to ask more ques. Desired outcome? It depends on what we as characters in hotseatting want. It is improvised because we do not know what questions the audience will ask. It is improvised because we do not know what questions the audience will ask. Sometimes we are not able to answer the question due to our lack of responsiveness or just plain don't-know-how-to-answer, so we have to improvise and think creatively how to answer. Ideas may not sound coherent but it diverts the focus to another subject. In this case, focus is shifted from blame of troll to maybe sickness, which is unavoidable. There are no easy answer that settles all questions, so it depends on what you want in order to achieve that outcome. It trains students to become more critical in thinking and examining set logic. But instead, hotseatting gets audience to think more than just believing what is presented or offered. Should we then be someone who is contented with what the media or even government offered? Why r we not asking questions??
It is improvised because we do not know what questions the audience will ask. Sometimes we are not able to answer the question due to our lack of responsiveness or just plain don't-know-how-to-answer, so we have to improvise and think creatively how to answer. Ideas may not sound coherent but it diverts the focus to another subject. In this case, focus is shifted from blame of troll to maybe sickness, which is unavoidable.
It also builds our problem-thinking skills. Because we don't know what the journalists will ask, the challenge is to think spontaneously and reasonably to come up with solutions with unexpected questions. Yes there is a script that we can write and do the expected things. Conversation, conference, presentations or not, all have scripts. No doubt it helps us to speak fluently and organise things better in our heads, but scripts do limit our thinking and knowledge. It hinders our thinking ability and responsiveness and alertness. How fast we can react to that. This is how ministers do their speeches in conferences. There are too many possibilities. Even if we rely on our scripts, how far can we go?? Scripts kind of put boundaries to our thinking capacity and disables it. Our creativity becomes handicapped.
By listing down the issues of statements that the four groups we have presented, possibilities and topics are enlarged where teachers could make use of. Eg. one group did talk about violence and terrorism, so we can then expand our focus to violence and terrorism while exploring with the kids.
Hotseatting is a good activity for character study, scenario planning and training rehearsals. We get to know the characters in detail, like how they will feel, what they will do. The questions that journalists ask form our perceptions or perspectives that we have towards our own characters. Why, what, how helps us to understand about our characters better. Story becomes anchored because once we know our characters well, we are able to do scenes better with our perceptions and perspectives of our characters.
Is there then a desired outcome out of hotseatting? It depends on what we as characters in hotseatting want. It is improvised because we do not know what questions the audience will ask. Sometimes we are not able to answer the question due to our lack of responsiveness or just plain don't-know-how-to-answer, so we have to improvise and think creatively how to answer. Ideas may not sound coherent but it diverts the focus to another subject. In this case, focus is shifted from blame of troll to maybe sickness, which is unavoidable.
We watched a play by Shakespeare. It was difficult to understand because of the English language used. It is probably their common verbal language of that day. The everyday language used in that particular culture. It's fine because we have singlish and if it were to be transported to that time of that era, the people wouldn't even understand. But I was impressed by how great their memory was. It was superb and their acting skills were so natural. They were so into their characters that there wasn't even any single moment where they are not in their characters. They may probably forget a few lines, but still it was amazing.
Issues that I can find:
- Girl likes guy/ guy likes girl.
- Guy has to bring his butler to somewhere else far away.
- Guy hates his brother.